- From: Michael[tm] Smith <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 02:57:41 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2016 09:58:13 UTC
> __Example:__ We can define normalization rules so that the following two PMIs will match: > * http://visa.com/payment-methods/credit-card > * https://w3.org/payment-methods/credit-card As I’ve explained in multiple other comments so far, it would be a mistake to assume that the W3C will agree to host URLs for the WG for these resources. The WG instead should consider taking responsibility on its own for setting up a hosting plan for them that does not involve the W3C continuing to have to troubleshoot any issues or downtime related to them and that does not involve the W3C continuing to incur any (unexpected) costs of hosting them for dozens of years long after this WG has completed all its work and gone away. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/205#issuecomment-221222143
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2016 09:58:13 UTC