- From: adamroach <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 07:28:21 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 14:29:18 UTC
+1 to @ianbjacobs' point, which I was about to make. 1. If we care about uniqueness and don't want a known list of non-ISO currencies, all we need is ISO codes and URLs. 2. If we don't care about uniqueness, all we need is ISO codes and something like the "+XXX" format. 3. If we care about uniqueness and want a published list of non-ISO currencies, we need all three. I'm hearing @adrianhopebailie say he doesn't care about uniqueness, which would point to option 2. I think we're going to run into practical issues if an identical code can mean two different things in two different contexts, so I think we need either option 1 or option 3. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/185#issuecomment-220043533
Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2016 14:29:18 UTC