Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] API flow (#177)

Here is a link to the image for those wishing to review and comment:
http://www.plantuml.com/plantuml/proxy?fmt=svg&src=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/webpayments-flows/gh-pages/TargetFlows/PaymentRequestAPI.pml

I like the idea but I don't think we should separate the mediator and browser in this spec (because this is a spec describing how the browser assumes the role of mediator so in this context they are the same thing).

I'd also like it if the PUML file was being submitted as part of the PR so that we can make edits directly to the diagram from this repo.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/177#issuecomment-217975209

Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 20:15:43 UTC