- From: mattsaxon <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:48:20 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/105@github.com>
In an effort to assist with prioritisation and focus for the Working Group post FPWD, I've reviewed the current list of open issues (54 at time of writing) So we can see the maturity of the documents, I've labelled issues where there is a clear specific document that they apply to as follows; Document Labels: ["Doc:PaymentRequestAPIArchitecture"](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Doc%3APaymentRequestAPIArchitecture) ["Doc:PaymentRequestAPI"](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Doc%3APaymentRequestAPI) ["Doc:PaymentMethodIdentifers"](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Doc%3APaymentMethodIdentifiers) ["Doc:BasicCardPayment"](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Doc%3ABasicCardPayment) Furthermore, I've categorised the issues into some broad categories based on the type of issue as follows; Type Labels: [General Editorial](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/General%20Editorial) [Native Support](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Native%20Support) [Technical](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Technical) [Security/Privacy](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Security%2FPrivacy) [Extensibility/Versioning](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Extensibility%2FVersioning) [Functionality](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/labels/Functionality) Lastly, I've applied a priority to them as follows using milestones; Milestones: ["Priority: High"](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/milestones/Priority:%20High) ["Priority: Medium"](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/milestones/Priority:%20Medium) ["Priority: Low"](https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/milestones/Priority:%20Low) I've assessed these priorities based partly on the "type", but also applied some more (personal) logic to this as below; General Editorial: Low Native Support: Medium Technical: Mostly medium, some lows Security/Privacy: High Extensibility/Versioning: High Functionality: Varies Overall this gives us the following breakdown of categories at the time of writing; Document Labels: "Doc:PaymentRequestAPIArchitecture" 3 "Doc:PaymentRequestAPI" 3 "Doc:PaymentMethodIdentifers" 0 "Doc:BasicCardPayment" 3 Type Labels: General Editorial 6 Native Support 1 Technical 8 Security/Privacy 7 Extensibility/Versioning 14 Functionality 20 Milestones: "Priority: High" 16 "Priority: Medium" 13 "Priority: Low" 16 We can discuss at the WG meeting on Thursday how to interpret (and refine) this data. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/105
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 18:49:16 UTC