Re: [browser-payment-api] Should Payment Method Identifiers and Messages be expressed using a Linked Data Vocabulary? (#45)

> This is a duplicate of issues #11 and #10.

Issue #11 is just about Payment Method Identifiers. 

Issue #10 is just about short codes for payment method identifiers.

This issue is about PMIs and the content of payment messages. It takes a more holistic view around how we're going to achieve a solution for #10 and #100. Specifically, this issue asks whether or not some/all of the 'key's and 'value's of the objects map to URLs.

I do agree that using a Linked Data Vocabulary expressed as JSON-LD would resolve #10, #11, and #45 in one fell swoop, but I don't think the rest of the WG is there yet, so would rather keep these issues separate for now (and assert that while there is overlap, the issues don't duplicate one another).

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/45#issuecomment-197902858