- From: Shane McCarron <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:09:24 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:10:31 UTC
I agree that we should use this once it is approved. However, we should NOT eliminate the prose. One of the problems with W3C specs that rely upon WebIDL is that there are assumptions in the API definition that are not made explicit in prose. This leads to implementation errors AND can be confusing for readers who are not WebIDL experts. The specs need to be Accessible. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/22#issuecomment-197348421
Received on Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:10:31 UTC