- From: mattsaxon <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 06:36:22 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/9/195958840@github.com>
With regard to UnionPay, there are some specific features of the Scheme when used for ecommerce transactions, that may dictate, or at least encourage a specific Payment Application for it. I'll get some more details, but the 1st time a card is used with a merchant, there is a One Time Password sent via SMS that needs entering. I'm not clear that the card can be used with just the usual PAN, Expiry, CVC, certainly there are a few references to UnionPay not being usable for ecommerce transaction out there. The nature of UnionPay leads me to suggest that whilst it is important, I don't believe it qualifies as ubiquitous. However I'm not suggesting we don't cater for it, in fact quite the opposite, I think it is a really good use case to model how it would work with registration and the creation of payment applications. For this reason I suggest that we model this at FPWD as something outside of the BasicCardResponse and try to asap work out how we would create a Payment Application to support this registration process. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/9#issuecomment-195958840
Received on Sunday, 13 March 2016 13:36:51 UTC