Re: [browser-payment-api] Suggest two alternative payment method identifier proposals (#34)

> is expectation that people with other proposals would edit this doc by adding more options (e.g. option 3, etc)?

Yes, we could add other options or refine the ones there. I'm not necessarily wedded to the language. I'd also like to highlight (probably more strongly than this PR) different issues and opinions people in the group have. I'd like to see proponents for option 1 propose changes to remove my bias against it. :smile: 

> Since you are proposing 2, I'd like to highlight a few benefits I perceive in option 1, perhaps they can be delivered in option 2 also?

Please propose how to change the language in the pull request to include your views in the advantages/disadvantages notes if you want. I think needing to dereference a URL in order to do an equivalence check would be a huge disadvantage, personally.



---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/34#issuecomment-195467737