- From: Zach Koch <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:33:37 -0800
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 16:34:10 UTC
I think I'm also generally in favor of URLs. I want to clarify what is being proposed in option 1. Would the idea be that *every* payment method should live at tobedetermined.com? Or just the ones that we standardize up front? For example, let's say my support payment methods were: Visa, Mastercard, and BobPay.xyz (a proprietary, closed-loop system). Would the final array look like: ```js ['https://www.bobpay.xyz', 'https://www.tobedetermined.com/visa', 'https://www.tobedetermined.com/mastercard'] ``` Which could then be made shorter with: ```js ['bobpay.xyz', 'Visa', 'Mastercard'] ``` Or is the idea that even Bobpay would have to live behind tobedetermined.com, such as: ```js [`https://www.tobedetermined.com/bobpay.xyz', '...', '...'] ```js Seems like it's the former, but I want to clarify. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/34#issuecomment-195440736
Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 16:34:10 UTC