Re: [browser-payment-api] Redefinition of BasicCardResponse to address Issue 9 (#25) from mattsaxon on 2016-03-11 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from March 2016)

From: mattsaxon <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 06:16:32 -0800
To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/25/c195382866@github.com>

@adrianhopebailie, I agree that visa is not a good PMI without some namespacing, it is a good example of a "brand" though and the naming does to some extent have the brand as a separately identifiable part of the PMI.

Are you not happy that my examples are reasonable PMIs?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/25#issuecomment-195382866

Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 14:17:02 UTC