Re: [browser-payment-api] Redefinition of BasicCardResponse to address Issue 9 (#25) from mattsaxon on 2016-03-11 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from March 2016)

From: mattsaxon <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 04:00:43 -0800
To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/25/c195340017@github.com>

Let me have a think on that, there was talk of a hierarchical naming too rather than the flat structure your suggesting, perhaps "card.plain.visa", "card.encrypted.visa", "card.token.visa". I'll read Adrian B's  proposals and comment further

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/25#issuecomment-195340017

Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 12:01:43 UTC