- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 10:38:15 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2016 17:39:07 UTC
@adamroach and @adrianhopebailie I like the direction of the evolving proposal: * The easy (standard) case remains easy (thanks to default value) * It gives extensibility for non-standard codes and increases the potential for interop * It does not require this WG to specify anything related to display * It does not require the browser to dereference any URLs. (The browser can just do string matching on an internal table.) --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/185#issuecomment-228124863
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2016 17:39:07 UTC