Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)

> I propose we resolve this issue based on @ianbjacobs proposal

Which one, his revised one or the original one?

If we're talking about his original one:

+1 for ISO currency codes
+1 for URLs (and specifying display behavior in a separate issue)
-1 for "+BTC" microformat currency codes. That proposal seems to put the WG in the position of maintaining a non-ISO currency code registry. If you have an experimental currency, use a URL.

If we're talking about his revised one:

> Anything else is undefined. So you can put whatever data you want there and some parties may make use of it.

-1 to this, sounds like we're not providing guidance to use URLs for experimental currencies.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/185#issuecomment-228052513