- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:40:56 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 01:41:29 UTC
@adrianba wrote: "Should a proposal for more complex matching semantics be adopted in the group then any requirements dealing with matching payment methods would need amending. Such a proposal would need to include a comprehensive solution to this issue." We (AHB, MattS, and I) took an action to look into grouping/subclassing based on 26 May discussion. I would like to have a proposal by FTF meeting time. If that proposal does not get traction, I have no problem keeping simple matching semantics in v1. [1] https://www.w3.org/2016/05/26-wpwg-minutes.html#item04 --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/211#issuecomment-224780081
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 01:41:29 UTC