Wednesday, 29 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context? (#2)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context? (#2)
Tuesday, 28 June 2016
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Fix a minor typo in PaymentRequest constructor description. (#221)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context? (#2)
Monday, 27 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Fix two minor typos. (#220)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context? (#2)
Saturday, 25 June 2016
Friday, 24 June 2016
Thursday, 23 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support for gift cards and discount codes (#145)
Wednesday, 22 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] Should we define nesting/grouping semantics for payment method identifier matching? (#1)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] Should we define nesting/grouping semantics for payment method identifier matching? (#1)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] Should we define nesting/grouping semantics for payment method identifier matching? (#1)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] Should we define nesting/grouping semantics for payment method identifier matching? (#1)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update Introduction to describe actors better (#121)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Propose a payment method specification that includes an example of field level security (#141)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
Tuesday, 21 June 2016
Monday, 20 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-methods-card] Added BasicCardRequest dictionary supporting specification of RequiredFields (#4)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Specifying Mandatory Data (#97)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are web-based payment apps supported? (#39)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add section on Extensibility (#44)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Combine API parameters into a single request object + options (#15)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Merge Payment Request Architecture with Capabilities Document (#42)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Any plan to allow this API to be called by non-merchants? (#35)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add section on internationalization (#53)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should show() be renamed? (#127)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Is it neccessary to distinguish the origin of data provided in the payment response, and how would we do it? (#173)
Saturday, 18 June 2016
Friday, 17 June 2016
Thursday, 16 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should it be possible to provide amounts in more than one currency (#3)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove totalAmount per telcon resolution. (#219)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove totalAmount per telcon resolution. (#219)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Specifying Mandatory Data (#97)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are payment requests and responses passed between the browser and third-party native wallets? (#50)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are web-based payment apps supported? (#39)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are web-based payment apps supported? (#39)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are web-based payment apps supported? (#39)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Specifying Mandatory Data (#97)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are payment requests and responses passed between the browser and third-party native wallets? (#50)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are payment requests and responses passed between the browser and third-party native wallets? (#50)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are web-based payment apps supported? (#39)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are payment requests and responses passed between the browser and third-party native wallets? (#50)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are web-based payment apps supported? (#39)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Specifying Mandatory Data (#97)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add section on Extensibility (#44)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Combine API parameters into a single request object + options (#15)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Merge Payment Request Architecture with Capabilities Document (#42)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Any plan to allow this API to be called by non-merchants? (#35)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Merge Payment Request Architecture with Capabilities Document (#42)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add section on internationalization (#53)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add section on internationalization (#53)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should show() be renamed? (#127)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Is it neccessary to distinguish the origin of data provided in the payment response, and how would we do it? (#173)
Wednesday, 15 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Any plan to allow this API to be called by non-merchants? (#35)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should payment app registration be included in the conformance criteria of the browser API spec? (#8)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should payment app registration be included in the conformance criteria of the browser API spec? (#8)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Any plan to allow this API to be called by non-merchants? (#35)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are payment requests and responses passed between the browser and third-party native wallets? (#50)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are payment requests and responses passed between the browser and third-party native wallets? (#50)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are web-based payment apps supported? (#39)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How are web-based payment apps supported? (#39)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Specifying Mandatory Data (#97)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Payment Instrument clarification (#104)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What is the extensibility mechanism for the payment request and response messages? (#146)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What is the extensibility mechanism for the payment request and response messages? (#146)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should payment app registration be included in the conformance criteria of the browser API spec? (#8)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add section on Extensibility (#44)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add section on Extensibility (#44)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Write-up initial proposal for payment app registration spec (#12)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Write-up initial proposal for payment app registration spec (#12)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the browser pass user data it has collected (email etc) to the payment app? (#194)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the browser pass user data it has collected (email etc) to the payment app? (#194)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should payment app registration be included in the conformance criteria of the browser API spec? (#8)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should payment app registration be included in the conformance criteria of the browser API spec? (#8)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Combine API parameters into a single request object + options (#15)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] How will the spec address versioning / feature detection? (#33)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Any plan to allow this API to be called by non-merchants? (#35)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Any plan to allow this API to be called by non-merchants? (#35)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Merge Payment Request Architecture with Capabilities Document (#42)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should Payment Method Identifiers and Messages be expressed using a Linked Data Vocabulary? (#45)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the payment API be more conversational or less conversational? (#51)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the payment API be more conversational or less conversational? (#51)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add section on internationalization (#53)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What component does the payment method intersection? (#103)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What component does the payment method intersection? (#103)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should we standardise a callback mechanism for payment apps to communicate to 3rd parties? (#109)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should we standardise a callback mechanism for payment apps to communicate to 3rd parties? (#109)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should show() be renamed? (#127)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Is it neccessary to distinguish the origin of data provided in the payment response, and how would we do it? (#173)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Dynamic Currency Conversion (DCC) Support (#178)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update "user accepts the payment request algorithm" to include interaction with payment app (#192)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update "user accepts the payment request algorithm" to include interaction with payment app (#192)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update references to "Payment Transaction Message Specification" (#218)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add shippingOption to response (#217)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What about billing address (#216)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What about billing address (#216)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add shippingOption to response (#217)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Add shippingOption to response (#217)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update promise rejection (#187)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update promise rejection (#187)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should it be possible to vary amounts depending on payment method (#4)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should it be possible to vary amounts depending on payment method (#4)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove unnecessary clause about validation. (#213)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Spec prohibits currency validation but doesn't define what it is (#175)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What about billing address (#216)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] What about billing address (#216)
Monday, 13 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] PROPOSAL: PMI identifies payment method specification, use meta-data for additional granularity (#5)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] PROPOSAL: Use query string parameters for PMI matching (#2)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] PROPOSAL: Use query string parameters for PMI matching (#2)
- [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] PROPOSAL: PMI identifies payment method specification, constraints for additional granularity (#5)
Friday, 10 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Removing notes for closed issues. (#214)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
Thursday, 9 June 2016
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should PaymentResponse include totalAmount and if so must it be one of the supplied totals (#215)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Removing notes for closed issues. (#214)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Removing notes for closed issues. (#214)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Proposal to abort if updateWith promise is rejected (#209)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Proposal to abort if updateWith promise is rejected (#209)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the Payment Request API only be available in a top-level browsing context? (#2)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove special case handling for single shipping option. (#210)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove special case handling for single shipping option. (#210)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Proposal to abort if updateWith promise is rejected (#209)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove unnecessary clause about validation. (#213)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Simple editorial fixes. (#212)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove unnecessary clause about validation. (#213)
Wednesday, 8 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should we support a delegated state for PaymentRequest? (#7)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should we support a delegated state for PaymentRequest? (#7)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove unnecessary clause about validation. (#213)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Simple editorial fixes. (#212)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Simple editorial fixes. (#212)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Proposal to abort if updateWith promise is rejected (#209)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove special case handling for single shipping option. (#210)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Proposal to abort if updateWith promise is rejected (#209)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove special case handling for single shipping option. (#210)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove special case handling for single shipping option. (#210)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Support different amounts per payment method. (#211)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Remove special case handling for single shipping option. (#210)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update "user accepts the payment request algorithm" to include interaction with payment app (#192)
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Proposal to abort if updateWith promise is rejected (#209)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Rename remaining types so that all begin Payment* (#208)
Tuesday, 7 June 2016
Friday, 3 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Terms and conditions next to "Pay" button (#195)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Terms and conditions next to "Pay" button (#195)
Thursday, 2 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Rename remaining types so that all begin Payment* (#208)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
Wednesday, 1 June 2016
- [w3c/browser-payment-api] Rename remaining types so that all begin Payment* (#208)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update promise rejection (#187)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update promise rejection (#187)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Currency Types and Rendering (#185)
- Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Update promise rejection (#187)