Re: [w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers] Support for PMI's with schemes other than https? (#17) from Marcos Cáceres on 2016-12-20 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from December 2016)

From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:22:55 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers <webpayments-method-identifiers@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers/issues/17/268182840@github.com>

I would get input from the WebSecWG before we change text here. In general, I agree with the intent - but if some weird "secure"(tm) protocol gets used by one UA, it risks screwing over all other UAs and remaining spec-conformaning.  

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-method-identifiers/issues/17#issuecomment-268182840

Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2016 08:23:29 UTC