Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Cannot use 2119 terms in notes (#240)

I don't have an opinion re: accessibility, but I do share @annevk's concerns about RFC2119 terms in non-normative text: It can lead to unintentional confusion, particularly because a lot of people (both devs and implementers) end up relying on notes to understand the spec text so they can take the "should" as RFC2119 SHOULD and so on.  

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/240#issuecomment-242624535