Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What is the format for payment method identifiers for distributed extensibility (#11)

I would vote for reverse domain names. I like the idea of using URLs, but I don't see an advantage to having a URI that we could actually hit with HTTP. The Payment App Registration proposal is indeed just a proposal, but if its an indication of where we are headed then we wouldn't be using the identifier itself as a way of acquiring information about a payment app.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/11#issuecomment-215923899