Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should well-known identifiers be used for ubiquitous payment methods (#10)

In #149 @dret said:

> the current draft defines/allows identifiers to be used in short or long forms. most experience with identifiers in the wild shows that no matter how clear equivalence rules are defined, they tend to be ignored, leading to problems with identifier recognition, and interoperability issues. unless there is a very compelling reason why non-unique identifiers should be supported, it may be better to forego the convenience of a shortcut notation, and always require identifiers in some canonical form.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/10#issuecomment-215660551