- From: kirkalx <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:44:10 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Sunday, 24 April 2016 01:44:40 UTC
>From the point of view of a dedicated cryptocurrency participant, this would be suspect because of these elements (and possibly others): 1. who owns the registry and why should we trust them? 2. is the label "42" attractive in itself or for marketing reasons? (c.f. DNS) 3. who owns the 42 entry and why should we trust them? 4. if "nobody" owns the 42 entry, and the 42 community forks into 2 or more subsets, all of which claim to be the true 42ers, which group can keep using 42? 5. in that situation, is there a (non-manual) way to force each of the subsets to adopt a new identifier that is unique to them? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/150#issuecomment-213864445
Received on Sunday, 24 April 2016 01:44:40 UTC