Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] Should the list of transaction types be extensible? (#112) from Adrian Hope-Bailie on 2016-04-22 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 06:05:36 -0700
To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Cc:
Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/112/213421754@github.com>

As #19 looks like it will be concluded with "No, leave it the apps" this is no longer relevant

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/112#issuecomment-213421754

Received on Friday, 22 April 2016 13:06:14 UTC