Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] General Comment on Registry Design (#148)

On 2016-04-21 16:04, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Just for completeness... there are several other "registries" maintained
> by the W3C:
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1
> [2] https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions
> [3] https://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab
> [4]
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xhtml-modularization-20081008/conformance.html#s_conform_naming_rules
> [5]
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-role-attribute-20130328/#extending-the-collection-of-roles
> [6] https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#the-context

sorry for the off-topic remark: that's a very useful list and the W3C 
should have a place where it is published. IETF/IANA with their ~2000 
registries may play in a different league here, but it seems to me that 
any org managing evolving registries of values should have some place 
where people can find out about which ones are available. a registry of 
registries (pardon the pun).

http://www.iana.org/assignments/


---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/148#issuecomment-213169067