- From: Erik Wilde <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:49:04 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 23:49:33 UTC
On 2016-04-21 13:47, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote: > +1 for identifiers > I see no value in dereferencing these identifiers to anything other than > a human readable specification therefor I'd consider their value to be > primarily as identifiers. *if* identifiers are going to be HTTP URIs, then of course nothing stops their creators to put up documentation at that address. but i would still recommend the registry to associate documentation links for each registered identifier, which can be used by registry users to access documentation that has been vetted during registration, and has to remain stable over time. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/150#issuecomment-213162539
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 23:49:33 UTC