- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:27:00 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 21:27:32 UTC
@dret, My personal view is that: * the primary computation on these identifiers will be equivalence testing. * it is useful to ALSO be able to dereference them. I have tried to make the case for using URIs and dereferencing them to get the relevant payment method specification. I have not converted many people. @adrianba and perhaps others have cited the risk of high-volume (and likely unnecessary) dereferencing. I have also started to write up some payment method identifier design notes: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/PMI_Notes Ian --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/150#issuecomment-213120513
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 21:27:32 UTC