Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] What is the extensibility mechanism for the payment request and response messages? (#146) from Shane McCarron on 2016-04-20 (public-webpayments-specs@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Shane McCarron <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:10:33 -0700
To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Cc:
Message-ID: <w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/146/212518542@github.com>

Fascinating.  Are you saying that there are (some) user agents / processors that actually use WebIDL as a way of creating their implementation?  That shocks me.

Regardless, we REALLY should have a way to say "and anything else" or "and anything else that matches a pattern".

I note that WebIDL 1 is in CR review right now.  Good time to propose a change.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/146#issuecomment-212518542

Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2016 17:11:14 UTC