- From: Dave Longley <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:20:28 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 19:21:24 UTC
@ianbjacobs, > That answers my immediate question. That suggests "option 1". I think it's a little bit of Option 2 (we should be clear about what Payment Method Identifiers are) ... but I may be misunderstanding there. But, for the most part, yes, we don't have to actually say what the particulars are. However, we *should* say that there's a way to express those particulars in an interoperable way -- use this technology to do that. And then maybe a note on some examples or something -- or just include examples in an extensibility spec that uses that technology. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/143#issuecomment-212075964
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 19:21:24 UTC