- From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:05:07 -0700
- To: w3c/browser-payment-api <browser-payment-api@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 11 April 2016 17:05:40 UTC
@adrianhopebailie, > What this suggests is that we should split out a bunch of the browser API spec into a generic mediator spec that defines the conformance criteria for a mediator. The browser API spec would then reference that document and define the specific behavior of a UA (as mediator) including the API it exposes and state changes etc. I like the idea of a Mediator spec (written for those implementers), a payment app spec (written for those implementers), and links between them. Here are some topics that would be discussed: Mediator spec: * Receiving the payment request * Displaying relevanet --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/1#issuecomment-208451202
Received on Monday, 11 April 2016 17:05:40 UTC