Re: [w3c/browser-payment-api] grammatical updates to the payment method identifier spec (#124)

> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@
>          <p>This section relies on several other underlying specifications.</p>
>          <dl>
>            <dt>URL</dt>
> -          <dd>The terms <em>URL</em>, <em>absolute URL</em>, <em>URL parser</em>, and <em>URL equivalence</em> are defined by [[!url-1-20141209]] <small><em>(or the editor's draft)</em></small>.</dd>
> +          <dd>The terms <a>URL</a>, <a>absolute URL</a>, <a>URL parser</a>, and <a>URL equivalence</a> are defined by [[!url-1-20141209]] <small><em>(or the editor's draft)</em></small>.</dd>
>          </dl>

> Should these <a> tags not be <dfn> tags?

Not if they are terms define in other specs, right? As such, I think Respec automatically resolves the `\<a>`-marked references to generate hyperlinks that lead to the external definitions in the correct specs.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/pull/124/files/778fcb352163aba8712c30335da15a81b0210d78#r59126479