Re: Verifiable Claims WG Proposal (presentation)

On 6/21/2016 7:10 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> On 06/20/2016 09:07 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> I think I understand why the simplest form of the architecture
>> diagram is appropriate for this set of slides.
> 
> Yes, we believe that most AC Reps want to see a general architecture
> diagram, but don't want to be bothered with the details (as it's the job
> of the Working Group to make sure to get that right).

+1


>> The only point I'm a bit curious about is the reason for excluding
>> the more-detailed version of the architecture from one of the
>> referenced 'detail' documents?
...
> The details are important for building the system, but they are
> marginally useful for someone that is trying to decide if they should
> vote to start the work at W3C or not.


That last paragraph is a nice gem that should be engraved in any tutorial materials for folk trying to get a standards effort started...

d/


--

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net