Re: Almost there: Verifiable Claims Working Group Proposal

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> All,
>
> The Verifiable Claims Working Group proposal is nearing completion.
>
> There are still some details to wrap up:
>
> 1. There are some final terminology decisions that will be made
>    tomorrow, resulting in minor updates to some of the documents.
> 2. The first diagram in the architecture document is being refactored.
> 3. The use cases need a few bits of new content (to aid readability)
>    and an editorial pass.
> 4. The data model specification needs an editorial pass.
>

Although largely editorial, the document will look a good bit different
after I get to work on it Thursday and Friday, so if you want to wait until
the weekend to review that's okay.


> 5. The implementer commitment feedback won't be in before the end of
>    the week, so we expect more organizations to go into the list.
>
> That said, the documents are consistent and should hang together for the
> most part now. Feel free to review the documents and nitpick them now,
> noting the caveats above.
>
> Start here, as it's where we will propose that folks that are new to the
> work should start:
>
> http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/primer/
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Web Browser API Incubation Anti-Pattern
> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/browser-api-incubation-antipattern/
>
>