Re: VOTE: Verifiable Claims Terminology

For "Consumer/Inspector/Relying Party/etc."

why not Guard? That's how we named it for WebID-TLS
https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/tls/#authentication-sequence

Henry

> On 10 Jun 2016, at 06:18, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> 
> In order to make the terminology used across all Verifiable Claims
> proposal documents consistent, we need to seek consensus on the proper
> terms. This poll is an attempt to seek consensus on the terms we will
> use for the Verifiable Claims Working Group Proposal.
> 
> The poll is an Instant Runoff Vote (IRV). There are three contests, make
> sure to order your choices in all three. Drag the candidates to arrange
> them in order of preference with your favorite at the top and your least
> favorite at the bottom.
> 
> The poll opens now and will close at midnight (ET) on June 15th.
> 
> Be sure to take time carefully ranking items, even the ones at the
> bottom (it matters in an IRV).
> 
> https://www.opavote.com/vote/6609369386975232
> 
> -- manu
> 
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching
> https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
>