Re: Updated data model specification document

Waiting for examples :)

Seriously, if anyone would like to shoot me XML versions of all the
examples I would be willing to add a section for XML.  If not, I will
remove the mention of XML.  Whether we mention XML or not there is no
intention to say that only the listed syntactic mechanisms are permitted.

-- dan

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:36 AM, <brian.sletten@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why is XML mentioned in section 3.1 as a possible serialization but
> nowhere else?
>
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 7:13 AM, Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have updated the data model specification draft.  As before, the
> document can be found at
>
> http://opencreds.org/specs/source/claims-data-model/
>
>
> The major changes since last week are:
>
> - added introduction
>
> - added UML diagram for the data model
> Known items still to do:
> - Fix/update links and references
> - Update JSON-LD examples to be either real or closer to real
> - Change "TBD Credentials" to real name once we have it
> - Clean/unify wording now that we have "TBD Credentials" as a term we can
> use
>
>
> I encourage review, especially of the new introduction and UML diagram.
>
> -- dan
>
>