- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:10:17 -0600
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Message-Id: <CAM1Sok3iTHUEdV2zTaOiqtE4VW9tzWNMoDjx=2AeMAQrYQ4kTg@mail.gmail.com>
Perhaps the problem statement needs to be cleared up in lay terms more effectively. IMHO the inclusion of Linked-Data technology changes opportunities substantially. I'm not clear on whether people who use internet generally or even many within the technical domain; are clear on the field of work of Linked-Data and the implications these works may have on the way communications technology interacts with life in a functional manner. Purely RDBMS related web-technologies have properties and limitations that are unlike the functional properties made available via linked-data related alternatives.. Re: Payment Use-Cases, - Warranty for products. - History of Products (ie: vehicles repair records) - Verified right to purchase (controlled products.) - Invoices? (i'm thinking about trades-people who may issue invoices in relation to services delivered) - Accounting (verifying accounts have been audited) - Verification of Payee (ie: paying the right person, who is a known legal entity, et.al <http://et.al/>.) - Registrations for Commissions (inc. online royalties for sold creative works) - Availability of (verified, financial) records in a privacy preserving way whilst enhancing capacity to more easily search / organise disparate records from a plurality of providers, through the utility of open-standards.. I can think of others... Yet. Wasn't sure if you kept the list short purposefully... On 20 February 2016 at 15:57, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: On 02/19/2016 11:48 PM, Nick Shearer wrote: > >> On Feb 19, 2016, at 8:46 PM, Manu Sporny >> <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: >> >> Do you think that writing up a draft charter along with a set of >> use cases and presenting it to the interviewees again would elicit >> a clear answer on whether or not they think the work should be done >> at W3C? > > A draft charter would certainly clear up the scope of work that was > being proposed and allow that to be evaluated with regards to the > W3C’s remit, so could be a good idea. Great, thanks Nick. That's what we're planning to propose as a next step for the Verifiable Claims work during the Web Payments IG face-to-face (see slide 11): https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1K6VHQ38XCoGfadNmE1OVCkS7hq32XiBfq-iMCVN8o68/edit#slide=id.gf0c87eb4f_0_259 <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1K6VHQ38XCoGfadNmE1OVCkS7hq32XiBfq-iMCVN8o68/edit#slide=id.gf0c87eb4f_0_259> -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/ <https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/>
Received on Saturday, 20 February 2016 13:10:19 UTC