Hi Manu, I believe the report should focus on what the task force has done since approval in November [1]. That is why I do not think the survey or other preliminary work done by the CG should be featured, except to the extent that interviewees had specific observations about them. The full slate of materials from the CG is useful, but not especially for the discussion next week at the IG meeting. At the FTF meeting we should focus on what path forward would be most likely to lead to success. My sense from reading the materials and your response, is that there was not consensus from the interviewees on where to start work. You wrote "No one said don't proceed with work in this area.” and "No one said data model and syntax shouldn’t be worked on.” I would hope for support for a particular direction from the interviewees, not just lack of opposition. I look forward to further discussion face-to-face. Ian [1] https://www.w3.org/2015/11/23-wpay-minutes#item01 -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 18 February 2016 01:56:56 UTC