Verifiable Claims Interview Template

The Verifiable Claims Task Force has been interviewing industry experts
related to the Problem Statement[1] formulated by the Task Force.

In an attempt to cast a broader net, we are asking those that think they
have a unique perspective that has not been covered[2] to respond to
this interview template with their thoughts on the Verifiable Claims
Task Force work. You will be making these statements as an individual,
and not as a representative of your organization.

Please follow the steps below to submit your interview to the group.
Please try to get your response in by the end of Friday, Feb. 12th.

1. Make sure the email is being sent to both the
   public-credentials@w3.org AND public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
   mailing lists.
2. Make sure the title of the email is "Verifiable Claims interview
   for <YOUR_FULL_NAME>".
3. Provide input on at least the first four sections below (with any
   supporting thoughts that you may have after that). Be as terse or
   as verbose as you think is necessary to make your points.

----------

Background on <YOUR_FULL_NAME>
==============================

Who are you, which organization do you work for (but note that you are
making these statements as an individual and do not speak for your
organization), what is your background, and what unique perspective do
you provide on the Verifiable Claims work?

Feedback on Problem Statement
=============================

Is the Problem Statement at http://w3c.github.io/vctf/#problem accurate
as far as you can tell? What changes would you make? Would you remove or
add anything?

Applicability to Your Industry
==============================

How does the problem statement apply to your industry or industries that
you've been involved in? Is this a point of pain for the industries that
you're involved in?

Standardization Work
====================

What sort of technology or standardization work would help address the
problem statement? A data model, a data format, a protocol, or something
else? Which standardization body is best suited to do this work? If you
would like to comment on the design approaches listed here,
please elaborate: http://w3c.github.io/vctf/#design-approaches

-- manu

[1]http://w3c.github.io/vctf/#problem
[2]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dYup3KC2nak3LVTzyapr996TKxDj1w5Eyp4g13rQQBA/edit#heading=h.474cckqta3ic

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/

Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 17:41:53 UTC