- From: Frédéric Meignien <frederic.meignien@cantonconsulting.fr>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:30:51 +0100
- To: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
Hello Ian, I see you need a volunteer to think over the PISP flow. In the PSD2, this concept of Payment Initiation Service Provider is quite much used and explained. Would the idea of a "flow" be to clarify the role of this PISP in relation to other types of Service Providers ? Frédéric. Le 01/02/2016 22:14, Ian Jacobs a écrit : > Dear Web Payments IG, > > Today Harry Halpin and I submitted comments in response to the EBA’s discussion paper about strong authentication. Please see: > > Feedback on European Banking Authority Discussion Paper > https://www.w3.org/blog/2016/02/feedback-on-eba-discussion-paper/ > > Please note that Harry and I responded as individuals. The WPIG discussed PSD2 last week [1] and plans to discuss in more > detail at the upcoming FTF meeting [2]. Here’s an update on the summary of ideas [1] from last week: > > * Deeper discussion at WPIG face-to-face meeting. > Planned. > > * Work to establish a liaison with EBA. > I now have contact information thanks to the IG discussion. > > * Contribute an PISP flow diagram to the WPWG > NO ACTIVITY. We need someone to volunteer to do this. > > * Continued discussion of relevance of blockchain in this space (especially around authentication, clearing and settlement) > We also plan to have a blockchain discussion at the FTF meeting. > > * Possibly respond to the EBA discussion paper. > That was a reference to the blog post that went out today. > > I invite IG participants to comment on the blog post and look forward to further discussion in San Francisco. > > Thank you, > > Ian > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webpayments-ig/2016Jan/0045.html > [2] https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/FTF_Feb2016 > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2016 09:31:28 UTC