Re: Mozilla comments on Payments WG charter

On Sunday 2015-09-20 22:03 -0500, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>  3) Add in 3.2:
> 
>         "• Digital wallet to payment instrument communication : For the request and response messages for the Instrument Response, the payment messages are sent between the digital wallet and the payment instrument using information from the payment instrument's registration."
> 
>      This is the first time we will have spoken about wallet-internal communication. I wonder if we could allow for additional flexibility by reframing this as
>      user agent to payment instrument communication. Something like this:
> 
>         "• User agent to payment instrument communication : For the request and response messages for the Instrument Response, the payment messages are sent between the user agent (possibly via the digital wallet) and the payment instrument using information from the payment instrument's registration.”

That's fine with me; I think my first attempt to draft that edit was
more along those lines, but I decided to change it to fit better
with the digital wallet abstraction (which I admit I don't
understand the motivation for) that the charter uses.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)