- From: David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:54:48 +0000
- To: "nshearer@apple.com" <nshearer@apple.com>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "public-webpayments-ig@w3.org" <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Nick wrote: >Well, it would inherently have a focus on payments, whereas it seems to me end-goal of the task force has many applications outside of that space. >From the point of view of the CG, what you say is true. But AFAIK the objection doesn't come from the CG. Best regards, David -----Original Message----- From: nshearer@apple.com [mailto:nshearer@apple.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 12:46 PM To: David Ezell Cc: Manu Sporny; public-webpayments-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: No Web Payments IG meeting 16 November > On Nov 17, 2015, at 9:36 AM, David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> wrote: > > Nick wrote: >> Forgive me if this has already been answered elsewhere on the >> Credentials CG, but I am wondering how a task force under the WPIG >> would not have the same presumption of non-neutrality? > > Just to clarify, I believe that some people* have indicated that doing the discussions on the existing Credentials CG would be non-neutral. > > So far, I haven't heard that anyone thinks that discussion on WPIG would be non-neutral. Well, it would inherently have a focus on payments, whereas it seems to me end-goal of the task force has many applications outside of that space. I don't know if that is a bad thing or not, but it just seems to me the Credentials CG would be a better fit. But I don't partake in that CG so it's not something I have visibility of - perhaps there are other issues here. > > *I have no idea who those people are. > > Best regards, > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: nshearer@apple.com [mailto:nshearer@apple.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:53 AM > To: Manu Sporny > Cc: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org > Subject: Re: No Web Payments IG meeting 16 November > > >> On Nov 14, 2015, at 8:38 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: >> >> On 11/13/2015 05:18 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote: >>> It does not seem to me we need a call on Monday. All this can go >>> into the proposal: >>> https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/ProposalsQ42015/Creden >>> t >>> ials >> >> Looks like I'm not being clear. Let me try again: >> >> There is currently no workable proposal based on feedback from W3C >> and the Credentials CG. The proposed paths forward are in direct >> conflict with each other. >> >> So, there is nothing to talk about on November 23rd unless we come to >> a compromise. I don't want to try to come up with that compromise on >> November 23rd as it delays the discussion more than necessary. We >> have the information we need to have the discussion on Monday: >> >> https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/ProposalsQ42015/Verifia >> b >> leClaimsTaskForce >> >> At a minimum, we need the W3C staff contact (you), the Chairs, and >> other concerned parties on the call to make sure that there is >> agreement on a compromise path forward before sending it back to the WPIG on the 23rd. >> >> In an attempt to be even more clear: >> >> * You've asserted that a new Community Group is the best path forward. >> * The Credentials CG has rejected that path citing various concerns >> (re-creating what we already have in the CG, presumption of >> non-neutrality, increased workload, delays, etc.) > > Forgive me if this has already been answered elsewhere on the Credentials CG, but I am wondering how a task force under the WPIG would not have the same presumption of non-neutrality? > >> * The WPIG seems indifferent on the path, as long as the work gets done. >> >> So, we need to see if you (and the people you are channeling) are >> okay with the proposal above before we raise it with the WPIG because >> it doesn't do anyone any good if we propose something that's just >> going to be immediately vetoed. >> >> -- manu >> >> -- >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >> blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice >> https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/ >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2015 17:55:38 UTC