- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 11:14:13 -0600
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
- Message-Id: <B48F3912-1815-4D27-9AB3-15487D534F19@w3.org>
> On Nov 14, 2015, at 10:38 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 11/13/2015 05:18 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote: >> It does not seem to me we need a call on Monday. All this can go into >> the proposal: >> https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/ProposalsQ42015/Credentials > > Looks like I'm not being clear. Let me try again: > > There is currently no workable proposal based on feedback from W3C and > the Credentials CG. The proposed paths forward are in direct conflict > with each other. > > So, there is nothing to talk about on November 23rd unless we come to a > compromise. I don't want to try to come up with that compromise on > November 23rd as it delays the discussion more than necessary. We have > the information we need to have the discussion on Monday: > > https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/wiki/Main_Page/ProposalsQ42015/VerifiableClaimsTaskForce > > At a minimum, we need the W3C staff contact (you), the Chairs, and other > concerned parties on the call to make sure that there is agreement on a > compromise path forward before sending it back to the WPIG on the 23rd. > > In an attempt to be even more clear: > > * You've asserted that a new Community Group is the best path forward. > * The Credentials CG has rejected that path citing various > concerns (re-creating what we already have in the CG, presumption of > non-neutrality, increased workload, delays, etc.) > * The WPIG seems indifferent on the path, as long as the work gets done. > > So, we need to see if you (and the people you are channeling) are okay > with the proposal above before we raise it with the WPIG because it > doesn't do anyone any good if we propose something that's just going to > be immediately vetoed. Right now there has been no veto, only discussion. I think the best way forward is to have as complete a proposal as we can get, including the CG’s preferences. There are also staff discussions happening, and a more complete proposal will facilitate those discussions. There is not yet any concrete suggestion from the staff perspective, and there won’t be by Monday. ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2015 17:14:18 UTC