Re: Thanks to all and next steps

> On Jun 26, 2015, at 1:55 PM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Nick, Might we agree on the following statement?   "ISO 20022 standardizes only a message 'scheme' without specifying the various message types, because messages are transitory and they evolve with the diversity of payment systems in operation. For convenience the ISO 20022 community maintains a catalogue of message types structured according to the ISO 20022 standard. However that catalogue is not intrinsic to the standard."
> 
> Are you recommending that the IG's work should not even accept any dependence upon the financial industry's messaging scheme (or compatible)?

Joseph,

I *think* we may be down in the weeds at this point.

Do you think we need to resolve this question before we launch a WG? Or can we ask the WG to make the determination based
on what they perceive is necessary for interoperability?

Ian

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447