Re: comments on draft Payment Architecture WG charter

Hi,

David wrote:

> (2) Some parts of the "Web Payment Vocabularies 1.0"
>     deliverable's description seem too specific.  In particular, I'd
>     like to remove the entire (fourth) bullet point:
>
>       #  *  For each vocabulary, the Working Group will create at
>       #     least a JSON-LD serialization and may create additional
>       #     serializations (e.g., XML). 
>
>     I'd prefer that the group not be constrained to those particular
>     technical solutions.

Agreed. In general, WG charters should be narrow about *what* problems
the group tackles, but broad in terms of *how* it tackles them.


Ted

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 20:00:31 UTC