Re: Multiple Wallets

I agree.

Theoretically it could be "wallets all the way down" but practically that
seems unlikely.

It seems more likely that users will select a primary wallet that covers
90% of their payment instruments and this will link to one or two secondary
wallets that are needed to support obscure payment instruments.


For the majority of users even this won't be the case, they'll have a
primary wallet and that will be all.

On 17 July 2015 at 06:18, <Joerg.Heuer@telekom.de> wrote:

> … if we succeed to establish a wallet that really belongs to the user,
> multiple wallets should be the exception.
>
>
>
> If we ever see client-side wallets battling payee-side wallets, I’d call
> it defeat.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>                 Jörg
>
>
>
> *From:* Mountie Lee [mailto:mountie@paygate.net]
> *Sent:* Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 06:24
> *To:* public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
> *Subject:* Multiple Wallets
>
>
>
> Hi.
>
>
>
> when I review Charter
>
> it is describing discovery of payment schemes and selection of payment
> instruments.
>
>
>
> it seams that discovery and selection are under single wallet.
>
>
>
> but normally we can think user will have multiple wallets. (maybe user
> will choose primary wallet)
>
>
>
> I think the charter is not touching the case of multiple wallets.
>
>
>
> if we think discovery for multiple wallets, the operation and actors will
> be totally different by the location of wallet (client side wallet can be
> discovered by payee, server side wallet can be discovered by payer)
>
>
>
> how can I understand this scenario?
>
>
>
> regards
>
> mountie
>
> --
>
> Mountie Lee
>
> PayGate
>
> CTO, CISSP
> Tel : +82 2 2140 2700
> E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net
>