- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:06:30 -0500
- To: public-webpayments-ig@w3.org
On 02/12/2015 06:44 AM, Castillo Laurent wrote: > 1.. *Push vs Pull payments flows*(or Payer vs Payee-initiated > payments) Agreed and now tracked here as we need to author the text to put into the document and I don't have many free cycles to do that this week: https://www.w3.org/Payments/IG/track/issues/1 We should probably also get approval from the group before adding it (even though I think we have consensus on this particular item). > 2.. *Addition of a definition for payment schemes*(or any > other names we agree on). > > I suggest the following definition: Sets of rules and technical > standards for the execution of payment transactions that have to be > followed by adhering entities (processors, payer and payees). Done. https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-ig/commit/eaea2a5d4d3c35c4bbd4e282dd9a1f251982839e -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 03:06:54 UTC