- From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:46:56 +0200
- To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Cc: Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 3 August 2015 08:47:26 UTC
EMVCo's answer to card-not-present is tokenisation. This is what ApplePay employs. I expect this will be the same approach of the card-based scheme operators in adopting whatever standard comes out of the Web Payments WG On 3 August 2015 at 06:33, Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com> wrote: > The traditional payment industry have settled on using EMV for POS > transactions. > That is, even Apple Pay use EMV by emulating physical cards over an NFC > transport. > > EMV is a very low-level card protocol which at least historically always > depended on a trusted "Payment Terminal" which in turn did the actual > talking with other systems including the POS. > > Now to the issue... > A merchant Web server indeed function as a virtual POS but does a wallet > actually replace the payment terminal? > > The answer to this simple question will have dramatic implications on Web > Payment WG deliverables. > > Although I'm by no means an expert on EMV, my gut feeling is that we need > a NEW protocol for the Web in order to achieve comparable security to EMV. > > Anders > sending his weekly question/update > >
Received on Monday, 3 August 2015 08:47:26 UTC