Re: Mirroring posts to Web Payments CG?

They are both public lists so I see no issue in principal.

Why is it that CG members are unable to subscribe to the IG list if it is a
public list?
Perhaps we should simply address that?

Also, are you sure that we are not breaking some W3C rules by posting to a
CG mailing list via a bot?
I'd hate anyone to have the ability to subscribe a whole mailing list to
any other automated email system.

On 14 April 2015 at 21:41, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> Due to the funky way that the Web Payments IG mailing list is setup, the
> Web Payments CG members can't easily subscribe and respond to this
> mailing list traffic (even though it is public).
>
> This was okay for the first couple of months while the new group was
> finding its footing. Now that we almost have a FPWD out, I'd like to see
> if we can rope in some of the expertise of the CG (there are 200+
> members in that group).
>
> Here's what I propose:
>
> My organization sets up a script to clone any mail sent to this mailing
> list to the Web Payments CG list. The Reply-To headers are changed to
> the public-webpayments-ig-comments mailing list.
>
> This will ensure that web payments CG participants start hearing what's
> going on week-to-week in this group and are able to respond to our
> public comments mailing list while traffic on this mailing list
> (public-webpayments-ig) is kept to W3C members.
>
> Clearly, I won't do this until we have consensus.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments
> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
>
>