- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 20:23:54 +0000
- To: "public-webpayments-comments@w3.org" <public-webpayments-comments@w3.org>
- CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Hello webpayments, This note is to forward a comment from the Internationalization (I18N) Working Group on your document "Web payments use cases" [1]. This comment is located at [2] in Tracker: -- http://www.w3.org/TR/web-payments-use-cases/ I can't find any mention of geographic, country-of-residence, or other restriction on availability of an offer (maybe I missed it), or on the ability to redirect users to locally appropriate equivalent offers. Is this a gap? There can also be specific T&Cs that apply differently based on the location of the user and provider of an offer (or of the third party payment system). -- [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/web-payments-use-cases/ [2] https://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/472 Thanks (for I18N), Addison Addison Phillips Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon) Chair (W3C I18N WG) Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture.
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2015 20:24:52 UTC