- From: Turner, David <davidt@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:57:08 +0100
- To: <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
In the definition [1] of satisfaction of an ontology by an
interpretation, point 4 says
[[
There is some o \in R with <o,S(owl:Ontology)> \in ER(rdf:type) such
that
for each Ontology Annotation of the form Annotation(p v),
<o,S(v)> \in ER(p) and that if O has name n, then S(n) = o
]]
The v in Annotation(p v) may be an individual, as well as a URI or a
literal, so that S(v) is not defined. If v is a named individual then I
suspect that S(v) may be interpreted as S(v.name) but if v is an
anonymous individual it is unclear how to interpret this condition.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/direct.html#3.4
--
Dave Turner Cube T400, HP Labs Bristol, Filton Road, Bristol BS34 8QZ
davidt@hp.com +44 117 3129104 (Work) +44 7962 811627 (Mobile)
Hewlett-Packard Limited. Registered No: 690597 England
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 09:57:17 UTC