- From: Turner, David <davidt@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:42:36 +0100
- To: <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
In the definition [1] of satisfaction of an ontology by an interpretation, point 1 says [[ Each URI reference in O used as a class ID (datatype ID, individual ID, data-valued property ID, individual-valued property ID, annotation property ID, annotation ID, ontology ID) belongs to VC (VD, VI, VDP, VIP, VAP, VO, respectively); ]] The 'respectively' links a list of 8 properties to a list of 7 properties, which can't be right. Also, there doesn't seem to be such a thing as an 'annotation ID'. An obvious fix is to delete 'annotation ID' from the first list. It may also be desirable to add 'ontology property ID' and 'VOP' to the respective lists. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/direct.html#3.4 -- Dave Turner Cube T400, HP Labs Bristol, Filton Road, Bristol BS34 8QZ davidt@hp.com +44 117 3129104 (Work) +44 7962 811627 (Mobile) Hewlett-Packard Limited. Registered No: 690597 England Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 09:42:45 UTC