- From: Bdn 01 <bdn_01@hotmail.com>
- Date: 4 Mar 2006 14:59:33 -0800
- To: public-webont-comments@w3.org
OWL Web Ontology (XML Presentation Syntax) Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 22:59:28 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Hello, I have been following the development of the web ontology work for over a year now and found the work on this topic extremely exciting. I do now however have a concern that it does not cater for the situation where an individual's property value may be neither a datatype, or another Individual, but rather a class. The reason I write is I would prefer to correctly apply the owl standards than extend the standards to cater for what (to me at least) seems to be a standard case. I have posted the example below to help ilustrate this scenario: How to express that a child has a preference for dogs rather than cats as a pet? - A given child is an individual with property "hasPetPreference". - A dog or a cat is a class (we should allow for identifying an actual beast as an individual having class dog or cat). Rgds Brendan
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 07:48:56 UTC