- From: Mary Holstege <holstege@mathling.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:33:55 -0700
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 02 May 2005 11:59:29 -0700, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 11:30 -0700, Mary Holstege wrote: >> Dan, >> >> In discussing your comment[1] the XML Schema WG realized >> that we need some clarification on what the actual use case >> is before decided what action to take. >> >> The DAML+OIL example you cite is using barenames with >> a schema document as a left hand side to refer to simple >> types in a schema with no target namespace. > > I'm not sure if the lack of a target namespace was on purpose. So, just to be super clear: #foo:bar is not a barename, true? Thank you for the rest of your clarifications; that is most helpful. Cheers //Mary
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 00:34:40 UTC